Talk:Phonocentrism
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Phonocentrism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Phonocentrism appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 May 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Citation needed
editHaha, "citation needed" is painfully ironic in this article -Pietro 24.84.229.90 (talk) 07:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Unbalanced
editThis entry seems to have been heavily edited by some Ong-disciple. Whatever Ong's accomplishments, I don't think his contribution to this debate merits 5 footnotes (4 more than Derrida!), 2 bibliography entries, and 5 in-text references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.220.67.144 (talk) 11:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
edit: graphocentrism
editThere seems to be a bias built into the discourse article of this article. It seems to serve to obscure an objective sociolinguistic interrogation of the differences of how spoken language and written language function and interact. I think we can look into these distinctions before we get so far down the line into the postmodernist critiques of meaning itself & the semiotics implications. It is an exercise for sociolinguistics.
If the graphocentrism article did a better job at fleshing out the point of view that favors the written over the spoken, then we might be able to find a balance on this. skakEL 16:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- If you are interested in this and related topics. please take a look at my recent contribs. You may notice that the article spoken language is very weak. skakEL 16:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)