Talk:Philip Tew
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editAll of this sounds more like self-promotion, more like the vigorously-written CV of someone going for an academic job, than "biography"! Is he really worthy of a long entry detailing where he went to school and where his son went to university? Surely not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.154.102.195 (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Almost certainly this page has been written by the author himself. Deleting it is the only responsible thing to do, as Tew is by no means celebrated or famous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.100.197.250 (talk) 06:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia's own guidelines, entries on people suggest that a person should be “worthy of note or notice; remarkable.” This entry fails to satisfy that criteria and should be eliminated. He's just a prof at a university, one of thousands worldwide. Contributions are minimal at best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.100.197.250 (talk) 05:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Apparently anyone who feels like it can create a Wikipedia entry for themselves, judging from this entry. Should be deleted but perhaps no one much cares about quality here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.100.197.250 (talk) 04:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Notability and sourcing
editHave tried and failed to find any references to add, and am wondering whether Tew is notable enough. I have not tagged the article as such because it's possible being co-director of the Brunel Centre for Contemporary Writing would make him qualify under WP:NACADEMIC. Would welcome others' views. Tacyarg (talk) 23:57, 15 August 2021 (UTC)