Talk:Phil Lyman
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Baltimore Bridge Collapse / DEI
editI would suggest the addition of Representative Lyman's comments about DEI and the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse so long as it remains neutral. There seems to be no shortage of sources and his statements would seem to support the current article labeling him a "firebrand". Baroness Samedi (talk) 15:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
AI used in writing?
editMuch of the political career section bears hallmarks of AI writing. It's repetitive, but more importantly, it keeps going "on the one hand" "on the other hand," characteristic of an AI trying to ensure balance. There's also a lack of direct reference to the source material. 2603:7000:A100:15AA:BDD0:8899:1FD9:5394 (talk) 15:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)