Talk:Pete Gilbert

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Runcorn 22:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


Untitled edit

It's not appropriate to have all this stuff in the first person. If it's a quotation, it should be shown as such, and sourced. - Runcorn 17:43, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Marked for deletion edit

This subject seems to be non-noteworthy. Cannot find any more information on him other than his own website, and pages derived from Wikipedia. I suspect this is a vanity page, or similar. SiGarb | Talk 20:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • While I don't disagree, the article doesn't seem to fit CSD. Please PROD or AFD the article, happy editing! Teke (talk) 05:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pete Gilbert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply