Talk:Persona 3/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by GamerPro64 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  

#:: The "Drama CDs" section is un-referenced and the Gameinformer reference link is dead.

  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
If the problems aren't fixed in 7 days, I will fail it. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
The Drama CD section has citations, but I left them in the list of CDs. I've put them back in the prose.
Looks like with the GI redesign a lot of the old reviews have disappeared. Looking for an archive... --gakon5 (talk / contribs) 01:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Archive link added. --gakon5 (talk / contribs) 01:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
With all of the fixes done, I will pass it. GamerPro64 (talk) 15:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply