Talk:Perfect Dark (2010 video game)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Swarm ^X 20:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Alright, the first thing I did was look at the previous review. I have to say, it doesn't look like any of the major issues still exist, but I there's some issues that I'll list before I do a final check.

• "a new special agent for the Carrington Institute. On her first mission, she is sent to meet an insider from the dataDyne corporation."

  That wording should be changed so people who are unfamiliar with the game can relate.

• "most reviewers felt that the game is still a fun and exciting shooter."

  That's one of those phrases that just doesn't sound neutral. It sounds promotional, even. It simply needs to say that most critics liked the game, instead of telling the reader that it's "fun and exciting".

• I agree that the "Enhancements" section could be changed to "Enhancements and changes". Not a big deal though.
• A 'see also' section should be added. (this actually isn't needed)

GA checklist will be up in a moment. Swarm ^X 20:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Pass

Apart from my above comments, everything else looks good. Swarm ^X 20:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article so quickly. I've fixed the issues you listed. If there is anything else that I should know, please let me now. <--Niwi3 (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2011 (CET)

Alright, good work. I have no other concerns, so I'll go ahead and list the article. Swarm ^X 23:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)