Talk:Pennsylvania Route 666
 | Pennsylvania Route 666 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Number of the Beast! Kitia 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Reassessment edit
Article is compltete, history/rd could be expanded. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 02:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 666/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, but I've got class in 15 minutes and I have to leave. Give me 2-3 hours and I should have the reviews up...at the MOST I'll have it up by tonight. Cheers, —the_ed17— 17:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- What the heck is a "hamlet"? (this isn't Shakespeare, so... :D)
In some of the section titles, you have "Old PA 666". What is this?Never mind, I skipped over it in my reading.
- What the heck is a "hamlet"? (this isn't Shakespeare, so... :D)
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Two very minor issues. Fix those and the article passes. Cheers! —the_ed17— 21:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done. Don't forget to transclude the page.Mitch32(UP) 21:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
USRD GA audit edit
This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)