This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
"A short distance later, Routes 371 and 670 crosses a fish hatchery and enter the community of Pleasant Mount, where the route becomes surrounded by development.' - two things. First, there is a noun/verb non-agreement, and you should specify the type of development
...no, the noun/verb agreement is still messed up. "Routes... crosses and enter". I'm not sure what you mean about aerials, but where does the Yahoo maps say anything about a fish hatchery? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I can toss the fish hatchery, but Yahoo provides the aerial service on their maps site so you can see aerial views of the route.Mitch32(Can someone turn on the damnair conditioning?) 19:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
"into a more moderate developed community" - the moderate is throwing me off there. Also, I have a bit of issue citing a map when you're referring to the development of a community. That's something that should be in prose.
It still says "moderate developed community", which doesn't make sense grammatically or in the other context. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
You have two consecutive sentences starting with "There," - try changing for variety
"The turnpike itself, fared poorly later on, with the abandonment occurring in 1853." - I'm not really sure what you're trying to say with the comma usage
Route 371 was once part of the main Newburgh and Great Bend Turnpike and because of the way PennDOT mangled the designation.Mitch32(Can someone turn on the damnair conditioning?) 19:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I won't bother put it on hold, since I'm sure my concerns are easy enough to address. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Alright, most of my comments were addressed. The only problem I see now is using a map to say things like "enters a forest area" or "surrounded by houses", when the map doesn't actually say that. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just to pop in a comment, but if the hybrid/satellite view is used in the online mapping service (Yahoo, Google, Bing, Mapquest, etc) then yes, the map does indicate physical features like forests and residential developments because the roads and map labels are overlaid on top of a aerial photo of the area in question. Just a thought to ponder. Imzadi 1979→ 01:00, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yea, I think that would be a short-term solution. However, I believe there is a fundamental project within the roads project with regards to citing images. I did a search, but I could not find any wiki policy on using images as sources. I do think there is a fundamental accessibility issue there, however. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Dough4872: you removed this failed verification tag[1] without providing an edit summary. Please demonstrate that the information can actually be verified from the source, I can't find much of it. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply