This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I only know of the controversies surrounding Josh Brandwene from reading this article, and from drilling down to the source...The Collegian. I am not close to the program, but I certainly know of the Penn State athletics scandals writ large, which led to the conviction of the former President of the University. I am concerned about whether the article fairly addresses the allegations of abusive behavior, as 1) the source for the information is single, albeit from several articles. Given the serious nature of the subject, it might be best to add another source(s). The articles from the Collegian also appear to have a fair amount of bias. Regards, Bill McKenna (talk) 02:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply