Talk:Pecking Order (game)

This page was proposed for deletion by Chidgk1 (talk · contribs) on 24 August 2024.

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@Cunard, I feel that sources may exist for this one, do you see anything? BOZ (talk) 13:09, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi BOZ (talk · contribs). Here are some sources I found about the subject:

Vasel, Tom (2006-08-02). "Review of Pecking Order". RPGnet. Archived from the original on 2024-09-07. Retrieved 2024-09-07.
The review notes: "I've played Pecking Order several times and have mixed feelings on it. It is about as far away from the complexity of Magic the Gathering that Mr. Garfield can get - simply being a game in which players place thirteen cards on the table. It's very simple and has a bit of fun, but I almost feel that the game is over before it begins. I've seen people compare this to Lost Cities and other games of that type, but I just don't see it. The components are interesting (although overpriced), and gameplay is interesting - I'll certainly hang onto my copy. But I just am left with a slightly empty feeling after games, which will keep me from playing it too often."
There is a bachelor's degree thesis here but those are unreliable.

Cunard (talk) 08:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks @Cunard, I will add that one. :) BOZ (talk) 17:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic