Talk:Paul Kelly (journalist)

"Regarded by many"

Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?

Wetman

It's safe to say that his books on the 1975 are widely regarded as the best available treatement. But, yes, we should provide a source for that statement. Newspapers from around 11-Nov-2005 might be a good place to start looking. CWC(talk) 15:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Australian editor

Does anyone know what the 'editor-at-large' and 'editor-in-chief' distinction refers to? It sounds a bit like an in-joke from the paper itself and needs to be elaborated upon. Ashmoo 03:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The jobs are different. An Editor-in-chief is where the buck stops for getting each day's paper out of the door. Kelly's role is that of a journalist, but one without the supervision of a Section Editor -- in effect reporting to himself, an "Editor at Large". Furthermore, Editor in Chief is a common position in a paper, whereas Editor at Large is an invented position, presumably to keep Paul with The Australian and as The Oz's way of honouring a staff member who has produced outstanding work for thirty years. Gdt (talk) 11:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Paul Kelly (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140914112013/https://www.mup.com.au/items/149038 to https://www.mup.com.au/items/149038
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125003257/http://lowyinstitute.org/StaffBio.asp?pid=468 to http://www.lowyinstitute.org/StaffBio.asp?pid=468
• Added archive https://archive.is/20121230173507/http://www.lawbooks.com.au/book/the-keating-howard-years.do to http://www.lawbooks.com.au/book/the-keating-howard-years.do
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110220230825/http://www.asialink.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/26292/citation_paul_kelly.pdf to http://www.asialink.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/26292/citation_paul_kelly.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140914112013/https://www.mup.com.au/items/149038 to https://www.mup.com.au/items/149038
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060619132537/http://www.ejournalism.au.com/ejournalist/kelly.pdf to http://www.ejournalism.au.com/ejournalist/kelly.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)