This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
1836 U.S. Patent Office fire was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article is the odd one out in Category:Hotel fires as it was never in use as a hotel from what I read. The building was an unfinished hotel which was bought by the government and turned into a patent office in 1810. SpeakFree(talk)(contribs) 22:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that's correct. Thanks for explanation for removing Category:Hotel.--Doug Coldwelltalk 22:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I decided to be bold and move the article, even though it was on the front page. The new title is more in line with Wikipedia naming guidelines, and sounds much better, I think. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment