Talk:Passing (gender)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Passing (gender) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | Methods of passing as female was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 October 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Passing (gender). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| Methods of passing as male was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 October 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Passing (gender). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
What’s citation 10? edit
Cannot find the reference anywhere lol 38.88.111.240 (talk) 03:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
I've tried looking through and finding some of these other references in this section, I think it's a whole big confusing mess :/
SalomeCzapiewski (talk) 15:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Gender Attribution section kinda weird edit
So I was trying to do typical WikiGnome things and edit grammar and wording, but I found the last sentence of the Gender Attribution section to be strangely worded to the point I wasn't even really able to understand the point they were trying to make.
This concept can be summarized by the work of SJ Kessler, W McKenna and H Garfinkel, "This not directly visible 'cultural genital'[11] which is expected to be there "exists in a cultural sense if the person is assumed to have it".[12]
Just as well, the references don't have any links and appear to be formatted incorrectly and confusingly.
I'm still relatively new to Wikipedia but this was just one minor problem in an article full of problems that I noticed and wondered if anybody else had any opinions on what to do.
Thanks folks~
SalomeCzapiewski (talk) 15:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 9 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RivkaBrock22.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cristalgal30 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Gggaby.m.