Talk:Park Hall, Shetland

Park Hall, Shetland was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 16, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The future for this article

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey guys,

As you can see, the article has been reviewed and is currently far below the standards of a good article. This building appears to be one significant to the location and to many locals. I have looked through local forums (I have some links to these if anyone is interested) and found it to be so. It would only be right for the article to be improved upon to meet at least a B standard. If you can help with this article, feel free to do so. Also, if you have any pictures of the house or if you think you could get any, that would be greatly appreciated! Once again, thanks to the reviewer and thanks to anyone that helps out - JohnSmith678 (talk) 20:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic