Talk:Paraphrasing (computational linguistics)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Nagualdesign in topic Peer review request
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paraphrasing (computational linguistics) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Peer review request edit
Hello, I am a new editor on Wikipedia. I am done with an initial draft and would like to know of any improvements I could make to this article. Neonrights (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Neonrights: I'd say it's an excellent effort for a draft. My only concerns are about the level of jargon and undefined acronyms like LSTM and BLEU. Wikipedia articles need to be understandable to laypeople, not just to experts in the field. In keeping with MOS:LEAD, the lead paragraph isn't merely an introduction, but should serve as a concise overview of each section in the body. An additional sentence saying something about the important areas of research (generation, validation, etc.) would suffice. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)