Talk:Pandur II (8×8)
![]() | Portuguese Pandur was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 14 April 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pandur II (8×8). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pandur II (8×8) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Source
editMy info for the Pandur 6X6 APC and the Pandur 8X8 APC comes from this book: http://www.netstoreusa.com/hjbooks/186/1862271887.shtml Dudtz 5/12/06 2:17 PM EST
Weight
editWeight: 19,300 kg 18.7 t What does this mean? Last time I checked, 1 ton is 1000kg, so how can the number be different? Or should that be the special american short tonne, which is 1016 kg? Because even then, it would not be correct... --Tartaros 19:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
The book that I have has a few misprints. Dudtz 6/31/06 10:19 PM EST
Dates incorrect?
editquote: The first batch of vehicles arrived in early 2008. On October 1, 2007 the first batch was rejected
How come the first batch be rejected BEFORE it was delivered? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.238.192.226 (talk) 12:04, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Typo?
editquote: The driver is provided with a single piece hatch cover as well as three day periscopes...
That would be three WAY periscopes, right?
- Why "way"? They are periscopes for use during day time (on some vehicles, periscopes - mainly the driver's - can be replaced by a night periscope).
- And could you sign your post please? dendirrek (talk) 05:44, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
editCyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.army-technology.com/projects/pandurII/
- Triggered by
\barmy-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pandur II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ssabox.com/templates/Page____9307.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Austrian Pandur order of December 2016
editThe text on Wikipedia states:
There is some information that should be added or corrected.
First: Not the ″Pandur II″ was ordered by Austria, but an entirely new development, called ″Pandur Evolution″ (or ″PANDUR EVO″). It has a new hull design with additional protection, more internal space for the crew, which makes it possible to transport 11 instead of 9 soldiers (including the commander, the driver and the gunner; this transport capacity is equal to the ″Pandur II 6x6″ with long wheelbase), a new engine with up to 20 kW/t (″Pandur II 6x6″ with long wheelbase: 13,39 - 20,3 kW/t, depending on the engine)and a rear ramp instead of the doors.
Second: The contract was signed on December 22, 2016.
https://www.gdels.com/pr.php?news=97
Lemanus (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it really seems that Austria ordered basically a new design called Pandur EVO based on Pandur I 6x6 but with modern features of Pandur II 6x6. The question is - in my opinion - whether to create a new article about Pandur EVO, or to add information about this variant to Pandur I/II articles, or to merge Pandur I and II articles into one that would contain information about all variants, i.e. Pandur I, II and EVO?--Mossback (talk) 07:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)