Talk:Package (package management system)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Package (package management system) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Package (package management system) → Software package – It's essentially a software package, thus describing it through "package management system" doesn't seem to fit. At the same time, already existing Software package doesn't make much sense as a disambiguation page. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 03:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Strong oppose a software package is more likely the non-"package" (ie. DEB/RPM/tarball/etc) meanings than the DEB/RPM/etc meaning. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:18, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment the most likely meaning would be retail boxed software, but we don't seem to have an article on software retail sales. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - "software package" has a more general meaning than what's described in Package (package management system). Disambiguation is appropriate. ~KvnG 13:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.