This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I cleaned up some, but there's still a lot of marketing words in this article. The article should be a factual description of what the system/development is for; it should be encyclopedic, and there's still an awful lot of hyperbole. --Sam (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
I used the word funding re-allocation where (5) is sourced. The article is about a debate of whether funding is neccessary during a specific fical year, not over the life of the program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PEOC3TPublicAffairs (talk • contribs) 20:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
