Talk:PG 1047+003
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Natg 19 in topic Requested move 24 February 2024
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
UY Sex or Y Sex? edit
The infobox is contradictory, it lists this as UY Sex and Y Sextantis
76.66.197.2 (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Requested move 24 February 2024 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus for move after 1 month. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
PG 1047+003 → UY Sextantis – According to WP:STARNAMES, for stars that have no Bayer or Flamsteed designations, the Henry Draper Catalogue (HD) number, variable-star designation or the Gliese number should be used for the article name about the star. As PG 1047+003 has no HD number or Gliese number, the variable-star designation UY Sextantis should be used. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 16:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support While the variable star designation is less common overall based on an ADS search, it's simpler and seems to be preferred by newer sources. SevenSpheres (talk) 17:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.