 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
this is the finding of a life time —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.151.145 (talk) 15:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- I sense your misanthropic cynicism isn't entirely misplaced but... but can you divide a baker's dozen pizzas in 12 equal parts without totally making a dastardly mess of the last pizza ? See Egyptian fraction. Now you can have a beer and pizza night with a group of friends so much more happily. FeatherPluma (talk) 02:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Clean up
editArticle has been tagged since 2010 as inadequately referenced. In starting to clean it up, it turns out that there has been a proposal since 2010 for merger with E-assessment, with intermittent but ongoing postings in favor of that on that article's talk page. There is also Electronic marking, which sits in the same concept area. I am in favor of bringing all these articles together in one place, and of adding proper referencing to this topic in that consolidated article. None of these articles are individually satisfactory. As a merged article there will be an adequate amount of referencing and content. The discussion thread is at Talk:Electronic assessment#Renewed merger proposals. FeatherPluma (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)