Talk:One Bullet Away

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Debate in topic Merge with Nathaniel Fick

Untitled

edit

I am new to wikipedia, so please excuse me if I sound ignorant. I don't understand why badlydrawnjeff deleted all of that information. I was planning on expanding it as soon as I had a little more time. It's one of my favorite books ever, and I just want people to be aware of it's existence. --MKnight9989 12:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem. I simply wasn't sure if or when you'd be back, and someone attempted to delete it, so I figured a lighter stub would be a better choice short term. Feel free to expand at will. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate your patience badlydrawnjeff. See, I'm new to wikipedia (I've created four articles including this one; one has been deleted) and I'd appreciate any feedback/help on this article. Please get back to me soon. --MKnight9989 12:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

i could help in editing this article if you'd like. i own the book along with it's companion generation kill. as far as it's relivance the story is being turned into a movie, fick himself has spoken before congress, the book itself is on the marine corps commandants reading list.

--Boymonkeyevil 17:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I got this book for Christmas of '06, and I love it. In my opinion, anyone who has read this book has the right to edit this article.--MKnight9989 12:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Nathaniel Fick

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was keep separate. -- Debate 14:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Keep - Although the article is short it has at least 2 editors who've committed themselves to expanding the article and IMO it's a sufficiently notable book by a notable author. – Conrad T. Pino 04:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep- I agree. I know I haven't done much since I created it, but I've been awfully busy lately, and if anyone can help it'd be appreciated. --MKnight9989 13:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep . As a pretty expierienced editor, I must say that this is a book worthy of its own article, that is, once expanded. Lord Dreamy § 14:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.