Talk:Omonadus floralis
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Whiteguru in topic Proposed merge of Anthicus floralis with Omonadus floralis
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article was created by the bot Qbugbot. For more information, see User:Qbugbot/info. For questions and comments, leave a message at User:Qbugbot/talk.
Proposed merge of Anthicus floralis with Omonadus floralis edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was no consensus per WP:Consensus. Merg discussion closed. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The names are objective synonyms, both being recombinations of Meloe floralis Linnaeus, 1758. William Avery (talk) 14:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Which one of the two articles do you want to keep? Also, is the whole Omonadus genus just an alternate name for the Anthicus genus? Gug01 (talk) 19:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.