Talk:Oireachtas (Irish Free State)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merger proposal

edit

It seems these three articles are never going to ever significantly expand from their current sizes or in different directions from one another due to the fact limited time period in which the Oireachtas of the Irish Free State existed and the limited amount of encyclopedic information which can be produced on them. A large amount of the information on these pages are duplicated. One article would make it much clearer to readers and prevent them from having to move to the Dáil Éireann (Irish Free State) and Seanad Éireann (Irish Free State) pages and to discover similar content. I oversaw this process being used for the Parliament of Southern Ireland article which merged the House of Commons and Senate sections into it, after a few additonal tweaks I had the quality of the article reassessed and it had changed from a Start class article to a B class article. I feel this success would be at least replicated in this case also. Shatter Resistance (talk) 17:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles. Shatter Resistance (talk) 17:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - The Parliament of Southern Ireland never actually came into operation, while the Irish Free State existed for 15 years so there is plenty of scope for them to expand over time. Snappy (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

edit

No comment in over 6 weeks, close as no consensus. Snappy (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oireachtas of the Irish Free State. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply