Talk:Ohio's 15th congressional district

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

2006 results edit

Where we get these numbers? The OH secretary of state site is still showing Pryce 101,636, Kilroy 98,100. [1] Pryce is the likely winner, but Kilroy has not yet conceded [2] and there are about 18,000 votes not yet counted--and that won't be counted until sometime after OSU's football game tomorrow. [3] I'm going to remove the boldface for now as every major news source is still saying this race is too close to call. -MrFizyx 22:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

OK, a number of sources, agree with what was posted here, (Pryce 119,208 v Kilroy 107,947), but for some reason most of the major news sources don't seem to be using those figures. If Pryce is up 11,000+ votes I suppose she will almost certianly win. -MrFizyx 00:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ohio's 15th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply