Talk:Normal bundle

Add topic
Active discussions
WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Start-class, Low-priority)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.
 

Abstract manifoldEdit

The paragraph on stable normal bundles starts off with "Abstract manifolds...". It seems to me that this should be rephrased along the lines of "Generally, manifolds...". Or am I missing something here? Are abstract manifolds a thing? 77.250.56.167 (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

"Abstract manifold" is just a synonym of manifold when one wants to emphasise that there is no a priori given embedding into an affine space[1], as opposed to a "submanifold of  ", for example. At the moment "abstract" is linked to abstraction while "manifold" is linked to manifold, which makes no sense to me; so I'm linking "abstract manifold" to abstract manifold which correctly redirects to manifold. In this way the subsequent comment "only an embedding (or immersion) of a manifold in another yields a normal bundle" becomes sensible. Ale.rossi91 (talk) 12:46, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ W., Weisstein, Eric. "Abstract Manifold". mathworld.wolfram.com. Retrieved 2018-03-01.

Conormal bundleEdit

"and the ideal sheaf is locally generated by  ". Maybe I'm wrong; but don't we mean   ? 2A02:8071:B69E:9300:5471:1A9E:8287:91F8 (talk) 10:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)