 | Nord 2200 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 28, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Nord 2200/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 20:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Can review. Ping me up if I've forgotten about this in a week or so. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sure thing, I appreciate it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Should "Aéronavale" and "Centre d'essais en vol" use a language template?
- Rather to my surprise, the MOS says not to italicize names of organizations
- Suggest re-linking Aéronavale in the body
- It's a pretty short article. I don't think that readers will forget it that quickly.
- You only mention and link Nord Aviation as the manufacturer in the infobox, suggest adding a mention to the article
- consider using {{ill}} for Musée aéronautique de Vannes - Monterblanc
- AGF on offline sources wrt faithfulness and copyvio
- article seems reasonably comprehensive
- The source URL for the sole image is dead, can we get a live one?
- Sonofabitch, I'd just updated that. Done, again!
- Holding, just some minor comments. Nicely done. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- See if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Fate edit
Appears to have been scrapped in 2014 https://www.worldwarbirdnews.com/2015/01/04/nord-2200-prototype-scrapped/ MilborneOne (talk) 08:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Is the source RS? I don't think so because it appears to be an aggregator. I tried to follow the links to the original reports, but was unable to do so. They appear to be RS, but I'd really like to read the original stories before adding any of their material to the article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Agree not particularly reliable and other sources seem to be of a similar quality but I did find a later photo of the N2200 at https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/sncan-nord-aviation-and-nord-sfecmas-projects.16058/ which appears to have been taken in 2018. MilborneOne (talk) 15:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- That is nice, but somehow I think that it's still in copyright!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Agree not particularly reliable and other sources seem to be of a similar quality but I did find a later photo of the N2200 at https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/sncan-nord-aviation-and-nord-sfecmas-projects.16058/ which appears to have been taken in 2018. MilborneOne (talk) 15:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)