Talk:Noah Bennet/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Noah Bennet. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Noah's "power"
I understand that the graphic novel makes a big deal of his having perfect vision but that's not a power, it's simply the ability to see without corrective lenses. Many people have this "ability". Besides, the company would never have paired him with the Haitian, "One of Us, One of Them". remember? Padillah (talk) 14:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
I agree that his vision clearly isn't a power, but, nonetheless, I think it would be productive to make a category focussing on his abilities and skills. Sylar07 (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
My reasoning for this is that every other Heroes character has this type of category, and for the sake of consistency and quality it is relevant to the article. Sylar07 (talk) 01:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- I don't agree. I think the big deal was made because he wears glasses, no other reason. He doesn't need a section detailing his skills, even if he is a crack shot, knows how to cause pain to someone's finger and can see really well. Consistancy is also not a factor because he doesn't have a power. I don't think Ando has a "powers" section either. -- WORMMЯOW 08:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Neither Ando nor Mohinder have a section devoted to abilies. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 08:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Do we still need the Alternate Future section?
I'd like to get rid of the alternate future sections. They are outdated and invalid since Peter stopped that version of the future from happening. Yes, I understand there are references to the future in the new season but to keep the information on the off chance that it will be related to something that might come up is the embodiment of WP:CRYSTAL. We need to purge these sections. padillaH (review me)(help me) 13:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- WP:CRYSTAL prohibits unverifiable speculation about future real-life events. It does not prohibit the coverage of alternate timelines in works of fiction involving time travel and / or prescience. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 03:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)