Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)
Archive

Archives


Archive 1 Archive 2

A last short needed look edit

Please see possible "closing arguments" here, [1], and consider a final persuasive comment. Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Padillah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Greetings and Salutations edit

 
To Padillah:
Hello!
Congratulations!
You have been included in my first, and possibly only, Very Early Christmas List!
As an earnest fellow believer in Santa Claus, and possibly in Our Redeemer Liveth as well, you may wonder how you got on this list.
I have no idea!
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Unless I tracked down the connection in our user talk archives, in which case you know who you are!
Or not.
All the best for you and yours this Christmas 2018 and New Year 2019!
Athaenara jingles all the way 02:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Padillah (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _(I have no earthly idea)_. This is a corporate IP, I can provide details privately if necessary. I have been an editor in good standing for years and would like to resume editing (as real life permits). Padillah (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While it's true I can provide the IP address I currently appear to be using, the ISP we use has a scheme that allows for the outside IP to change as needed. While I currently see 104.129.194.197 in Whatismyip.com that may not hold for too much longer. I believe we are allowed any IP in the following ranges (104.129.194.0/23, 165.225.34.0/23, 160.109.104.0/24, 148.9.24.0/24). This is what prompted the response _I have no earthly idea_, because whatever IP I give may be invalid by the time it's reviewed. Oh well, I tried. Padillah (talk) 12:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
104.129.194.197 is part of the zscaler "cloud security" company, and serves as an open proxy. You'll need to disable that if you wish to edit here. Note that doing so may have other consequences. --Yamla (talk) 12:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
There's no way a multi-billion dollar company is going to disable its IP forwarding rules so I can edit WP. It used to be that only anonymous IPs were blocked like this, not credentialed users. Thanks for trying though. Padillah (talk) 12:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
WP:IPBE may be available to you, if you can demonstrate exceptional need. --Yamla (talk) 12:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Maybe too late, but... you're a computer programmer, surely you can set up a SSH connection to your own modem (or router behind it) from your home ISP and edit through a SOCKS proxy from an IP from your home provider. tgeorgescu (talk) 07:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply