Talk:No zuo no die

I suggest paying attention to this item

There are a number of potential reasons for deletion of the entry for "No zuo no die (不作死就不会死)".1.. Although the Internet buzzword was widely popular in China in previous years, it is not currently used by Chinese netizens, and it is not an official term. 2. Its global popularity and influence is controversial. Wikipedia prefers to include topics that have a global impact, rather than being limited to a particular region or culture.3. Internet buzzwords becoming a separate Wikipedia entry may lead to misunderstandings about language usage, especially for those who are learning Chinese and English. Therefore, making it a separate Wikipedia entry may not be conducive to Wikipedia's goal of providing accurate and useful information on a global scale.4. This entry may be considered a violation of Wikipedia's policy on articles that do not conform to Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people. While the Internet buzzword itself is not a biography, it may be misinterpreted as a motto or catchphrase of an individual character. If such an interpretation were to be added to the article, it could lead to the Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons. 5. According to Wikipedia's deletion policy, redundant or useless boilerplate is also a reason for deletion, as "No zuo no die (不作死就不会死)" could be considered redundant or useless boilerplate if it were included as a separate entry rather than as part of a wider topic, because of its content and the fact that it is not a part of a wider topic. template because its content and subject matter may overlap with other pre-existing entries. CHENG SHIYI (talk) 04:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline

There are no independent, reliable third-party sources for this word. 1eleven0086 (talk) 05:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

This article does not comply with Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources

This article belongs to the explanation of Internet vocabulary, lack of reliable sources, and there are vague and uncertain meanings, can not find official and reliable sources of explanation, to foreigners who do not understand the culture of China's Internet neologisms are suspected of misleading, and references are not authoritative, so according to the Wikipedia policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and the Wikipedia:Notability of reliable sources .Since none of this article conforms to the above Wikipedia policy it is recommended for deletion. Zhongxxin (talk) 05:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)