Talk:Nina Forever

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Revenant

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I settled on calling Nina a revenant, which is kind of a catch-all term for a returned corpse. It avoids the issue of whether she's a ghost, zombie, or other specific undead creature. Although Indiewire did call her a zombie in their review, there doesn't seem to be a broad consensus on exactly what she is. Thus, I think maybe it's best we just stick to revenant if we're going to call her anything. Of course, we could simply remove all categorization of her if we reworded the lead a bit. However, I'm feeling a bit lazy and content with what's currently there. I don't think it's original research to call a returned corpse a revenant. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:15, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic