Talk:Nikon D3000
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ubcule in topic Reversion of replacement image
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nikon D3000 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
- The article says, "[The Nikon D3000] is supposed to replace the D60 and D40 as Nikon's entry level DSLR". But isn't the Nikon D5000 going to replace the D60? --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 20:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed it does, I'll modify the article to conform with the hierarchy presented in the Nikon DSLR template. [SCΛRECROW]CrossCom 2.0 07:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Reversion of replacement image
editI replaced the existing image of a Nikon 3000 with one I felt was of clearly higher quality. (This was a slightly modified and retouched version of another user's image which I felt was already quite good in its original version).
DerkMahen12 (talk · contribs) reverted that to the previous version with the older image, but there's no edit summary, so it's unclear why this was if it wasn't because they thought that was a better image?
Here are the versions for comparison:-
Look forward to some feedback on this, thanks.