Talk:Nike of Callimachus
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Tokyogirl79 in topic Contested deletion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nike of Callimachus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion edit
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because I have created the paragraph about the Nike of Callimachus at the Callimachus (polemarch) topic, sometime ago. But i believe that since this is a statue it should be better to have a topic of its own and just have a hyperlink at the Callimachus (polemarch) topic which will lead to this article if someone is trying to find more information about the statue. I just haven't delete it from there because i want to make the Nike topic a little better before i delete the paragraph about it from the Callimachus page. (your reason here) --Gre regiment (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'm declining it for that very reason since I do have to admit that your rationale makes a lot of sense. However at the same time @Aerospeed: can still nominate this for AfD with the rationale that this should be redirected to the page for the individual (since the article is so small), so definitely try to keep expanding the article as a whole. Whichever way it goes, I don't think that speedy deletion is the right arena for this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)