Talk:Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Māori task force.

Auckland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 23 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Ngāti Whātua-o-Ōrākei to Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 23 March 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus; WP:Common name. (closed by non-admin page mover) ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 10:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ngāti Whātua-o-Ōrākei → Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei – Name used on their official website, in their Treaty of Waitangi settlement, most commonly used form of their name in the press. Prosperosity (talk) 21:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Support seems to make sense. We should probably still include the o in the lede though. Turnagra (talk) 01:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Support as definitely more common now without the o, but agree it should be in the lead, in reverse order. E James Bowman (talk) 21:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic