Talk:New York State Route 474

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic GA Review
Good articleNew York State Route 474 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Change of Intersection Template

edit

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 00:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 474/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Recommend GA with a few suggestions. In my opinion, it meets the 6 criteria. Well written, factually accurate, broad in coverage, neutral, stable (VERY stable), illustrated if possible. Possible improvements which are optional, but improve it could include an image or a map. Also add "(NY 474)" the first time after New York Route 474 since NY 474 is an abbreviation. Any notable structures or places should be mentioned, if any. Chergles (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I'll try to learn what is supposed to be done. Chergles (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    barely
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


checklist is above Chergles (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Conclusion by me: This article passes though improvements can be made, as suggested by me. Chergles (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Um, it's clear you have no idea what you are doing. --Rschen7754 (T C) 19:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Passing GA --Rschen7754 (T C) 20:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply