Talk:New York State Route 128

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic GA Review
Good articleNew York State Route 128 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2014Good article nomineeListed

Change of Intersection Template edit

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary.Fwgoebel 22:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 128/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: PointsofNoReturn (talk · contribs) 18:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The article needs more citations.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Sufficient for the length of the road.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The first two paragraphs of the history section need citations.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Sufficient for the route.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Completely unbiased.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    No edits since January 2014
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:  

PointsofNoReturn (talk) 18:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Considering the reviewer's complete lack of experience, I have put the article back on the queue for another reviewer. --Rschen7754 19:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply