Talk:New Jersey Route 92

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Good articleNew Jersey Route 92 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 92/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Infobox edit

  • No issues

Lead edit

  • No issues

History edit

  • No issues

Proposed alignments edit

  • Fix disambiguation issue with "East Windsor" according to this

Proposed interchanges edit

  • Source needed to verify information in "Route 92 (Princeton-Hightstown)" subsection

References edit

  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address other issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

That shouldn't have been there period, someone added it. Fixed the other problems. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 20:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
All issues have been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 92. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply