Talk:New Jersey Route 88

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Good articleNew Jersey Route 88 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 88/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  1. Past this intersection, Route 88 briefly splits into a one-way pair, with the eastbound direction following Princeton Avenue southeast before turning north onto Post Road, with County Route 630 continuing along Princeton Avenue, and westbound Route 88 following Princeton Post Road. - Should be split into two sentences.
  2. What is today Route 88 was first built as a hard gravel county road back in 1903, the first such road in Ocean County. - "What is today" → "Modern-day".
  3. In 1916, this road was designated as a part of pre-1927 Route 4, a state road that was to run from Absecon north to Rahway.[4] With the creation of the U.S. Highway System in 1926, U.S. Route 9 was also designated along this route. - I'm slightly confused here. Were Route 4 and US 9 concurrent then?
  4. Footnote #10 needs a citation.
  5. The "In popular culture" seems trivial and unencyclopedic to me. Could this be removed, or at least abbreviated to a brief sentence and incorporated into the history section?

Looks good overall. On-hold for now. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 (talk) 14:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, passing. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New Jersey Route 88. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply