Talk:New Jersey Route 68

Route 68 Freeway

More details, please.Mitch/HC32 00:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Honest to say, I cannot find much more about this planned freeway. Dough4872 (talk) 00:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

intersecting routes

The major junctions table appears to leave out the junction with CR 670 mentioned in the first paragraph of the RD. Also, I'd argue that CR 537 should be removed from the infobox, unless it's a major freeway or something. --LJ (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

For a route of this length, it is standard to include junctions with 500-series county routes. By the way, 537 is a long route that crosses the east-west length of New Jersey. Dough4872 (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I didn't see the separate standards at the NJSCR page before. --LJ (talk) 07:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I actually wanna put in that LJ is right. CR 670 is notable enough, as it is a former 500s CR spur (Spur CR 528) in Burlington.Mitch32^{(The Password is... See here!)} 10:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 68/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

A fairly short article, but it appears to be fully compliant with WP:WIAGA, so I'm awarding it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 68. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628183145/http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering to http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)