Talk:New Jersey Route 49

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Good articleNew Jersey Route 49 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 31, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 49/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This review may be done in parts due to time constraints. Lucked out.

  1. Lead: no comma after U.S. Route 130. First sentence of second paragraph is not clear. Pre- is not capitalized. Route description: 1.1 - "Route 49 passes through residential areas of Pennsville. The road intersects County Route 630 (Fort Mott Road) at 3.45 miles and continues into farmland." - see if you can combine sentences. 1.2 - is Sarah Run a body of water? History: Pre- again. Major intersections: in notes column, only first word should be capitalized. Overall: Outside of the lead, things should be linked to only once. "woodland" and "farmland" are overused. The prose can be at times monotonous - just a warning for FAC.
  2. Cites should not be in the lead. Consecutive statements next to each other that come from the same source only need to have one citation at the end of the consecutive statements. Same caveats regarding reliability of sources as in the other article.
  3. Neutral, broad, stable, images good.

On hold Not a bad article, just needs some fixes. It may be beneficial for you to go through the rest of your GANs and fix the recurring problems (cites in lead, Pre-) - it will save time. --Rschen7754 (T C) 20:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have gone back and made the changes to the article and will also fix my other GAN's. Dough4872 (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Passing. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

USRD GA audit edit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Dough4872 (talk) 22:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 49. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply