Talk:New Jersey Route 20

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Good articleNew Jersey Route 20 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 12, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Assessment edit

Eek.

  1. Shrink that pic a bit.
  2. More info: Major junctions, history, a longer introduction.
  3. An infobox.
  4. Sourcing for all.Mitchazenia(7600+edits) 20:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

NJ Route 20 at The GSP? edit

I didn't know there was an access to the GSP from Route 20 and vice versa.

--24.228.70.72 03:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)nextbarkerReply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 20/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I will be reviewing this article in the coming hours, thanks -Marcusmax(speak) 20:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Overall good job on this article it is well referenced the images including the map appear to be in order and seems to cover the topic pretty well. However there are a few issues that need to be resolved that I have listed below .

  • 1. The term "Route 20" is overused throughout both the Route description and History section, many of those can be simply replaced with "The route".
  • 2. The term freeway is wiki-linked twice in the history section, only one of those is needed.
  • 3. Finally I am a bit confused about your last sentence in the history section. It states that the addition was never completed and then goes on to say it was built in 2000. The two seem to contradict each other, if you could please clarify.
I have put this on hold until those minor changes are made, once they are I will gladly pass it. -Marcusmax(speak) 21:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 02:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
  Great in that case I will pass it now -Marcusmax(speak) 02:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 20. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply