Talk:New Jersey Route 109

109 as GSP?

Google Maps has the portion of Route 109 between Washington St. and the official so. terminus of the Garden State Pkwy. labeled as "Garden State Pkwy" and gives locations on this stretch as having addresses on the Garden State Pkwy. The surface level photos looking north approaching the parkway show prominent signs for the left turn to continue on Route 109 to meet US 9, but no sign pointing straight ahead for the GSP, and after it's too late to turn off, a small "TOLL ROAD" sign above another small regulatory sign.

It looks as though authorities are trying to obscure the beginning of the Garden State Parkway. What's going on?69.127.5.5 (talk) 23:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

From what I know, none of NJ 109 is part of the Garden State Parkway. Do not trust Google Maps as they have errors in their cartography. Dough4872 01:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I've seen my share of Google Maps errors, but in this case there seems to be justif'n, given the lack of signage picked up by their camera truck. I don't know where the first reassurance sign is saying "Garden State Parkway" northbound from the southern terminus, and I haven't the patience now to take a Google sign truck trip. I've never been farther south than the Margate exit in person. This also wouldn't be the first time I've seen a route that was signed-unsigned, so to speak, i.e. supposed to be signed but for some reason not, and apparently not from neglect.69.127.5.5 (talk) 21:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Lack of signage doesn't matter, according to the NJDOT straight-line diagram, none of NJ 109 is named the Garden State Parkway, it is an unnamed road simply referred to by its route number. By the way, addresses of businesses along the road is simply "New Jersey 109" according to Google Maps. Dough4872 21:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New Jersey Route 109. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514153745/http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/maps/1927tt2.jpg to http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/maps/1927tt2.jpg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628183145/http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering to http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Bridge name

• [1] - per AC Press, it was named in 2009 ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)