Talk:NetDocuments

competitors?

Would it help to compare the company's main product to HP WorkSite (PCworld article, HP sales material)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.105.250.11 (talk) 13:54, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Sources

References 2, 4, 11 and 12 are obsolete and should be removed. None of the references really explain why the company is particularly notable. Many small companies can generate good business, but still don't really attract the attention of the world at large enough to have an article on Wikipedia. Russellmwolf (talk) 12:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I have removed obsolete references, and added additional references from other sites. Rduncan88 (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

POV

I set the POV-Check tag on this. The second sentence, "Data security and strict digital asset protection are key differentiators of the service that allow organizations to confidently store and collaborate on their documents and email. Additionally, the powerful integrations with Microsoft Office allow for smart editing, drafting, searching, and version control. Extranets, secure links, and client portals provide collaboration and security to outside parties who require real-time access to relevant documents." reads like an advertisement to me. I can't trust the information it contains. Lenehey (talk) 18:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

I have neutralized some of the language in this paragraph to "Data security and strict digital asset protection are key components of the service that allow organizations to securely store and collaborate on their documents and email. Additionally, the integrations with Microsoft Office allow for editing, drafting, searching, and version control. Extranets, secure links, and client portals provide collaboration and security to outside parties who require real-time access to relevant documents." Rduncan88 (talk) 21:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on NetDocuments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100117213134/http://netdocuments.com/information/ to http://www.netdocuments.com/information/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)