Talk:Neil Turok

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Let me... edit

... write down the equation showed at TED

 

--kmath (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Potential Conflict of Interest edit

Hi all, I wish to notify other editors that I have offered to assist (Neil Turok) in editing his bio page. We have no personal connection before a few hours ago, when a friend recommended that I Google Dr. Turok, as we seemed to have interests in common. I am a lately retired physicist and astronomer who has been a Wikipedia editor for several years. I have a "lay physicist"'s interest in Turok's fields, though no claim to deep knowledge. I saw that he has very lately sought to edit his article, but been questioned on COI grounds. Anyhow, I hope that I may be useful to Wikipedia and Turok both, and perhaps learn a bit myself, and I declare that I have no personal interest beyond that just stated. I understand of course that the usual WP rules re neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sources must be satisfied. Wwheaton (talk) 04:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi all, May I say I am very new to Wikipedia editing. Someone called my attention to the Wikipedia bio of me, and the flags saying it needed additional citations from reliable and independent sources. In my naivety, I then added some extra references and corrected my birthdate which was incorrect. Bill Wheaton kindly alerted me to possible COI issues and I am more than happy to refrain from making any further edits of this page. Could I ask that someone else looks at these flags asking for more reliable references? Many thanks, Neil. Neilturok (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
hello, for "reliable sources" as wikipedia defines them see WP:RS. in addition, your personal website can be used for non promotional / non controversial content about yourself. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Turok's M theory finished? edit

Turok appeared next to Paul Steinhardt in episode 4 of Through the Wormhole, where they said that their entire M theory about branes and cyclic cosmology would be finished once gravitational waves would be oberserved (which this article indirectly refers to by pointing towards the Planck space observatory, as they believed that if gravitational waves would exist, they would first be detected by the Planck satellite), as that event would prove correct their direct competitor, which is inflationary theory that they sought to disprove by means of M theory. This event now came in February, 2016, when LIGO announced that they had directly observed gravitational waves. The article here should be corrected accordingly to show that Turok and Steinhardt's M theory has been disproven. --79.242.222.168 (talk) 16:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Turok's "equation of everything" edit

kmath's transcription seems to be from https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/all-known-physics-equation.228221/ which has errors. I've corrected them below:

The source material is Turok's talk "The Astonishing Simplicity of Everything", available on YouTube:

 

--Pawalls (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Neil Turok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neil Turok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply