Talk:Nechtan (mythology)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jessicapierce in topic Visible editorial comment in article

Vedic God edit

I skipped the doubt-template from 2009, as this refers to a genuine hypothesis by Georges Dumézil. The disputed second part 'close relative of the water' seems to me bare nonse, as the root *nepos- is not attested in the relevant Dictionaries, so I skipped it. Probably the author was referring to *nemb-. Sie the article on Neptune Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 15:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Grammar question edit

Where it says "his inhabited" should it be "his (cult) inhabited" or "he" inhabited?67.8.232.45 (talk) 13:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Visible editorial comment in article edit

The article currently contains the sentence "This is wrong and the link between this site is a Victorian invention." Aside from having poor grammar, the sentence seems inappropriate, but I'm not sure whether to remove it - is it a valid complaint? Can someone fix this, please? Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply