Talk:Nauru Regional Processing Centre
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to [1], there were just 2 asylum seekers left in November 2005 --Fred Bradstadt 22:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nauru Regional Processing Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061007212644/http://www.oxfam.org.au/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf to http://www.oxfam.org.au/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121021202533/http://bigpondnews.com/articles/National/2012/09/19/Work_needed_on_Nauru_detention_centre_796519.html to http://bigpondnews.com/articles/National/2012/09/19/Work_needed_on_Nauru_detention_centre_796519.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Nauru Regional Processing Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070326011637/http://www.oxfam.org.au:80/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf to http://www.oxfam.org.au/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nauru Regional Processing Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070326011637/http://www.oxfam.org.au:80/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf to http://www.oxfam.org.au/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Conditions v Access
editI added a paragraph on the current conditions based upon a primary source. That source has been removed and a new section created discussing media access. While some of the points I listed from the primary source are mentioned, not all are, and the source itself is ignored in favour of a non-primary source that contradicts the original article. I was under the impression Wikipedia preferred original\primary sources? I don't want to see an edit war started so rather than do anything now I'll just raise the points here. I do think something needs to be added to the conditions section as the impression a reader is left with is that conditions are very very bad, which contradicts the latest report. 人族 (talk) 03:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Sources
editA story about conditions here aired on NPR's Morning Edition this morning. Part 2 is tomorrow.
Several other sources have come out about it in the last couple weeks, too: SMH, BBC, Guardian, NY Times... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)