Talk:National Curriculum Framework 2005

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on National Curriculum Framework (NCF 2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080223134949/http://ncert.nic.in:80/sites/publication/schoolcurriculum/learningwithoutburdentext.htm to http://www.ncert.nic.in/sites/publication/schoolcurriculum/learningwithoutburdentext.htm#I
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080205015357/http://www.ncert.nic.in:80/sites/publication/schoolcurriculum/ncf/News%20&%20views.htm to http://www.ncert.nic.in/sites/publication/schoolcurriculum/ncf/News%20&%20views.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Issues with the article

We need an expert to review the article and resolve these issues:

• Remove any irrelevant, redundant, or factually incorrect statements.
• Identify and counter bias.
• Find suitable citations to support the text.
• Remove dead links.

Feel free to add your own suggestions.

P.S. I attempted to rewrite the article, but I'm not much familiar with NCF 2005, so I couldn't do much. Ambuj Shukla (talk) 07:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)