Talk:National Counterintelligence and Security Center

Latest comment: 6 years ago by AndyFielding in topic Ambiguity?
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Incomplete

edit

In April 2016 editor Grandia01 tagged this article as inmcomplete. Since it is an office whose work is almost entirely classified, it is not strange that there is not a lot of information published about its work. However, in order for the article to be incomplete, it must be lacking with regard to published information. If you are aware of any published information about ONCIX that is not covered by the article, please list it so that other editor's may fill-out this article. Thanks. The only thing that I see missing is the release in 2011 of their report "Foreign Spies Stealing US Economic Secrets in Cyberspace". which did generate some news. --Bejnar (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the introduction is long, but that is often the case with short article where there is not enough information to make sections. --Bejnar (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
understood. thanks for the clarification. Grandia01 (talk) 07:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ambiguity?

edit

"While ONCIX does not distribute warnings of potential threats to the private sector..." could mean two things:

  • ONCIX doesn't distribute warnings of threats that could affect the private sector; or
  • ONCIX doesn't provide the private sector with threat warnings (of any kind).

From the context, I'm guessing it's the latter. Should this be clarified? – AndyFielding (talk) 07:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply