This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
An anon editor nominated the article for review of neutrality. So, I'm here on the talk page with admittedly just a personal opinion. After carefully looking over the article, I would suggest that the article itself doesn't seem overtly biased to either side of the right-to-die debate, as it seems to represent primarily the facts of the situation (car accident, family's decision to request removal of the feeding tube, the court cases and decisions, Cruzan's death). One might argue for an inclusion of more on the controversy over "right-to-die" in this specific case. Alternately, for such discussion, it may be simpler to reference right-to-die instead on that topic. Anyway, that's my humble view, from just a plain old editor. --Umrguy42 (talk) 05:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, and, as weeks have passed with no rationale given, I'm removing the tag. --Badger Drink (talk) 06:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
