This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am Nancy Argenziano. This article has errors. This bill was to help residents of especially for profit nursing Homes and created higher staffing ratios so that residents actually got to a safe staffing standard. Residents were not getting the safe minimum standards because the for profit homes wanted more profits over appropriate staffing levels. The lobbyist who had entered my office with out an invitation while I was fighting on the floor of the Senate for protections, was laughing as some of those protections failed.
The for profit Homes gave tons of campaign money so those protections would fail. They had another member add tort reforms and they were very much for serious issues, not as you have indicated . Feeding people, hydrating those who couldn’t drink for themselves. Changing urine soaked beds etc. The CNAs who pleaded for help could not handle that many patients. It was different than your article indicated. I fought for a few years to get safe staffing standards and cameras in rooms since we had many abuse incidents. These Homes were 85% tax payers funded and those for profit homes profits were extremely healthy while residents suffered. That lobbyists nick name in then legislative realm was “Chase in Your face”. She was rude and thought she owned us all. Not me, and I sent a message that something stunk in Tallahassee. Titus1947 (talk) 13:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
