Talk:Nabadwip

Removal of content

I removed the bus and train schedules. The material is non-encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. I understand the desire to be comprehensive and it is a nice article but the schedules etc are not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Cheers. Jbh^Talk 16:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nabadwip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100209210539/http://www.wb.nic.in/westbg/nabadwip.html to http://www.wb.nic.in/westbg/nabadwip.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170729135056/http://www.dospiwb.org.in/site.php to http://www.dospiwb.org.in/site.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160329131028/http://nadiapolice.gov.in/PSDETAILS.html to http://nadiapolice.gov.in/PSDETAILS.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

I guess the meaning of navadvip is nine islands, being nava sanskrit and bengali for nine. 181.92.237.232 (talk) 02:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Why!

I don't understand why you reverted the edits in Nabadwip Wikipage without seeing the facts.

• I used the book reference Chaitanya Charitamrita, but you removed this book reference, saying the issue of WP:RS.(For your information, Chaitanya Charitamrita is one of the most primary biographies detailing the life and contribution of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu). And it is no doubt WP:RS.
• I used the multiple image template. This was reverted by you without any reason.
• I fixed the problem (File:Nabadwip somaj bari nrisingha mandir bigroho.jpg & File:নটকনা বা সাতকরা.jpg, this two image was coded badly) in the section of Festival of Nabadwip wikipedia.
• There were no references in Etymology part. I used reference and added some importent information. But unfortunately this also was reverted.
• I fixed some typo, but this also was reverted. you added deleted image, but why I realy don't know. বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 04:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@বাক্যবাগীশ: You used an unreliable website[1], a dubious publication called Nabadwip Sahitya Samaj. This is why I reverted your edit.

If you really want to expand about this subject, then you can use this source instead, by Oxford University. There is no scarcity of reliable sources for expanding the article. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 05:13, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@Aman.kumar.goel: You avoids the points I mentioned point by point in the previous reply. However, I know very well that this source is no doubt reliable source. But this book is for the life of Sri Chaitanya, not for the history of Nabadwip. Because of the birthplace of Mahaprabhu this book contains little amount of info about Nabadwip, but this is not sufficient. In the issue of reliable source I'm removing this source ([2]), but Nabadwiper Itibritto can't be removed as a reliable source. I'm reverting the information and removing this [3] source as par your advice.

I don't want WP:DE. Please stop this. Welcome and have a good day. বাক্যবাগীশ (talk) 06:52, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Then you should better know to use only those sources which are relevant to Nabadwip. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 11:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)